The fact of the matter is that Daniel LaPlante was convicted of murder by a jury. I agree that even prisoners should have the right to practice their faith without ridicule or harm, and that if something is truly necessary for a faith, it should be provided if at all feasible. My question is, if you are being punished for committing a crime, where do you stop at what is provided and what is not? Should prisoners be able to request specific meals if their religious beliefs prevent them from eating certain items? Should prisoners be allowed to request specific clothing, such as robes, or access to books and music? If they are entitled to anything they deem fit, who is responsible for paying for it?
The way that I see it, prison exists to serve two purposes: as a means of punishment, and to provide an opportunity to provide rehabilitation for those that are going to be released. The request that this inmate made irks me because the items requested are not required to practice Wicca. Yes, they help one develop their spirituality further, but they aren't things that a person couldn't practice Wicca without. On the opposite side, he isn't asking for steak at every meal, a bottle of wine for each ritual, and a sword to cast a circle with. Even if the requested items aren't necessary, does an individual's freedom of religion extend into the prison population?
What are your thoughts on this subject? Please comment to share your opinion.
What are your thoughts on this subject? Please comment to share your opinion.